
Chapter 4: Go Small to Win Big
Three yeses, three different kinds of business. A bookkeeper, a fitness studio owner, a guy who sold industrial parts. On day eighteen Maya looked at that list and made the decision that feels like the smart one and is almost always the trap. She decided to serve all of them.
Why wouldn't she? She could fix anyone's messaging. Narrowing to one type meant turning away the other two, and turning away money when you have six weeks of runway feels insane. So she wrote her positioning to be welcoming to everyone: "messaging help for small businesses." Open arms. Maximum market.
She tested the line on a few more people that week and watched it do nothing. Everyone agreed it sounded nice. Nobody felt it was for them. A bookkeeper reading "small businesses" doesn't think that's me, he thinks that's everyone, and everyone is no one. This is the same wall the spreadsheet built later, seeded here: a promise wide enough to include everybody is too vague to pull anybody.
The avoidance this time wears the mask of opportunity. Keeping the audience wide feels like keeping doors open. It's actually a refusal to choose, because choosing means some people walk away and you have to watch them go. Maya knew the fix. She'd told agency clients to niche down a hundred times. She just didn't want to do it with her own runway on the line.
The council was united and a little impatient. Sam Millsap, on what niching actually buys you:
Two reasons you niche down. Number one, it's way easier to become an authority in your space. When you're just a coach that helps anyone, you're competing with every single coach on the market. Number two, it eliminates all your competition. The more you niche down, the less competition and the more money to be made.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=oHyLZSQJE88&t=468s
Dr. Marc Morris put a number on the cost of staying wide:
This is where 95% of new coaches fail: they try to help everyone, instead of just picking one of the proven niches. You want to talk about a singular result, a singular problem, a specific demographic. People should come to your page and know exactly who it's for.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=UJc1hdHIQMQ&t=120s
So they know instantly it's for them. That was exactly what Maya's open-arms line failed to do. And Taki Moore, on the fear that a niche feels too small to work:
The three hardest things were probably just believing that the niche wasn't so small that it could actually work.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=JP_3iRJKK50&t=37s
Narrow enough that it scares you the niche is too small, and it works anyway. Maya's instinct was the opposite, so wide it felt safe. The council was telling her safe was the dangerous direction.
There was a guardrail, though, because you can niche yourself into a desert. Dr. Morris again, on the other failure:
Your niche should be specific enough to be recognizable. People should come to your page and know exactly who it's for, but still be broad enough to have paying clients within it. You don't want to help flag football refs that have gut issues. Who are those people? You need to have actual people in it.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=UJc1hdHIQMQ&t=161s
And Charlie Morgan's test, the one Maya ran her three buyers through:
There's six questions. The first one is, is this market growing? The next, validate the market by making sure they're actually in pain. The third is financials, is this market broke or not? Then 30,000-plus, are there more than 30,000 people in this niche? Then competition, are there competitors? And the last is targetable, can you actually find the people?
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=z8XzrsWNlTM&t=1416s
Competitors, he insists, are not a warning. They're proof of life:
You want competition. You do not want a blue ocean strategy where you get into a market where there's no competition at all. Imagine you're a goldfish looking for a pond. One pond has no fish in it at all. You'd be stupid to pick it, because there's no sign of life, no evidence that life is actually possible inside that pond.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=z8XzrsWNlTM&t=1550s
The fork was how to pick the one: from her own experience, or from raw market demand. Dielle Charon argues for lived mastery:
You want to decide on that niche based on your experience. So many people start coaching businesses by picking what's the flashiest or what sells the best. That's not how you want to build a business. You want to start by picking the skill that you have personally mastered.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=BjMqTkC0pys&t=111s
UpFlip argues for demand first, then layer yourself on:
Look at the market objectively and not emotionally, and then bring emotions or a passion into your product. Apply yourself to the market on what the market demands, and then start bringing your passion into it and find ways to integrate it within your product to stand above the competition.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=7b_58Bppsb4&t=2148s
Maya didn't have to break the tie, because her two answers pointed at the same door. The world she'd lived in for six years, and the world with proven paying demand, were the same world: founder-led service businesses. The bookkeeper. People who were excellent at their craft and losing deals because their website sounded like a brochure from 1998. She knew their exact pain because she'd sat across from them for years. They had money, there were far more than thirty thousand of them, and other people already sold them help, which meant the pond had fish in it.
The last sub-fork was whether to commit now or let the niche emerge from data. For someone with no offer, publishing into the open and watching who responds is fine. Maya had a defined offer and three buyers in hand, so she committed now and kept the right to refine later, the way LaTisha Styles frames it:
You might not get it right out of the gate. It might change, it might evolve, but the key is to just choose something and choose your unique solution. And then as you continue growing and as you continue learning, it might change, it might evolve, and that's absolutely fine.
▶ Watch the clip youtube.com/watch?v=LVDIgG4a-tc&t=316s
So Maya did the thing that scared her. She rewrote her line from "small businesses" to "founder-led service businesses losing deals to weak messaging," and she let the fitness studio and the industrial-parts guy go with a referral to someone else. Watching two yeses walk away was the toll. It cost her, on paper, two thirds of her validated market. It bought her the one thing the wide line never could: a bookkeeper who read her new line and thought that's me.
Marcus heard about the change and thought she'd lost her mind. He was aiming at venture-backed startups, the glossiest, best-funded logos he could picture, an audience that was broad, glamorous, and almost impossible for a week-old solo business to reach. He had picked the prettiest pond on the map without checking whether he could get to the water.
Maya had her who. She still wasn't sure, underneath, why she was doing any of this, and that wobble was about to matter more than she expected.
My verdict. A wide audience feels like opportunity and behaves like fog. The instinct to include everyone is really a refusal to be rejected by anyone, and it gets you ignored by all of them. The four-word version: smaller pond, bigger fish. Pick the niche narrow enough that one specific person reads your line and flinches with recognition, then make sure that pond actually has fish and a way in. The two yeses you turn away are the price of the one yes that says that's me.